| 引用本文: | 金辉宇,兰维瑶.双重积分器的二阶线性自抗扰控制: 快速无超调阶跃响应[J].控制理论与应用,2021,38(9):1486~1492.[点击复制] |
| JIN Hui-yu,LAN Wei-yao.Second-order linear active disturbance rejection control for the double integrator: fast and nonovershooting step response[J].Control Theory and Technology,2021,38(9):1486~1492.[点击复制] |
|
| 双重积分器的二阶线性自抗扰控制: 快速无超调阶跃响应 |
| Second-order linear active disturbance rejection control for the double integrator: fast and nonovershooting step response |
| 摘要点击 2451 全文点击 724 投稿时间：2020-05-28 修订日期：2021-08-15 |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| DOI编号 10.7641/CTA.2021.00303 |
| 2021,38(9):1486-1492 |
| 中文关键词 双重积分器 自抗扰控制 阶跃响应 无超调 相位裕度 低频外扰 高频内扰 |
| 英文关键词 double integrator linear active disturbance rejection control step response nonovershooting phase margin low-frequency external disturbance high-frequency internal disturbance |
| 基金项目 国家自然科学基金项目(61873219)资助. |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 双重积分器不易控制, PD和PID控制都难以实现其快速无超调阶跃响应. 本文发现单参数二阶线性自抗扰
控制能实现双重积分器的快速无超调阶跃响应. 同时能任意配置回路传递函数的增益穿越频率, 而保持相位裕度恒
为31.9?. 这是线性自抗扰控制优于PD和PID控制的一个例子. 分析和算例还表明, 在抗低频外扰和高频内扰方面,
二阶线性自抗扰控制优于PD和PID控制. |
| 英文摘要 |
| The double integrator is not easy to control.With PD or PID control, it is difficult to get a fast nonovershooting
step response. This paper finds that single parameter second-order linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) can
obtain fast nonovershooting step responses for the double integrator. Furthermore, it can assign the gain crossover frequency
arbitrarily, while the phase margin is always 31.9?. This is an example that LADRC is superior to PD and PID control.
Analysis and examples illustrate that second-order LADRC is better than PD and PID control in rejecting low-frequency
external disturbance and high-frequency internal disturbance. |