引用本文: | 高锋阳,罗引航,张凯越,王文祥,杨乔礼.低计算复杂度的永磁同步电机多步预测电流控制[J].控制理论与应用,2021,38(9):1466~1476.[点击复制] |
GAO Feng-yang,LUO Yin-hang,ZHANG Kai-yue,WANG Wen-xiang,YANG Qiao-li.Low computational complexity multi-step predictive current control of permanent magnet synchronous motor[J].Control Theory and Technology,2021,38(9):1466~1476.[点击复制] |
|
低计算复杂度的永磁同步电机多步预测电流控制 |
Low computational complexity multi-step predictive current control of permanent magnet synchronous motor |
摘要点击 2161 全文点击 830 投稿时间:2021-01-11 修订日期:2021-09-09 |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
DOI编号 10.7641/CTA.2021.10032 |
2021,38(9):1466-1476 |
中文关键词 永磁同步电机 预测电流控制 多步预测 计算复杂度 电感失配 |
英文关键词 permanent magnet synchronous motor predictive current control multi-step prediction computational complexity inductance mismatch |
基金项目 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFB1201602–06), 天津大学和兰州交通大学联合基金项目(2020056)资助. |
|
中文摘要 |
传统的永磁同步电机模型预测电流控制策略仅在一个采样周期内寻优, 难以避免陷入局部最优问题, 而多
步预测会增加预测次数, 计算复杂度成倍增长. 为此, 提出一种低复杂度的永磁同步电机三步电流预测控制策略. 首
先, 在延时补偿的基础上, 两步预测结合三矢量电压控制和最优占空比电压控制, 三步预测保持与两步预测相同的
电压矢量, 然后由代价函数选出控制电压矢量; 最后, 设计电感dq轴分量双闭环的鲁棒控制. 仿真结果表明, 相比其
他控制策略, 所提策略具有良好的动静态性能, 寻优代码执行时间降低了约51%; 在不影响输出电能质量的前提下,
开关频率降低了约17%; 并对电感失配造成的性能恶化具有抑制性. |
英文摘要 |
The traditional model predictive current control strategy of permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM)
is only optimized in one sampling period, so it is difficult to avoid falling into the local optimal problem. But multi-step
prediction will increase the number of prediction times, and the computational complexity will multiply. Therefore, a threestep
current predictive control strategy of PMSM based on low complexity is proposed. Firstly, on the basis of time delay
compensation, two-step prediction is combined with three vector voltage control and optimal duty cycle voltage control,
the three-step prediction keeps the same voltage vector as the two-step prediction, and then the control voltage vector is
selected by the cost function; finally, the double closed-loop robust control of dq axis component of inductor is designed.
The simulation results show that the proposed strategy has good dynamic and static performance, compared with other
control strategies, reduces the code execution time by about 51%, reduces the switching frequency by about 17% without
affecting the power quality, and has a certain inhibition on the inductance mismatch. |
|
|
|
|
|